Sunday, August 30, 2015

A real peace will be an economic boost to all the people in the region YJ Draiman -


A real peace will be an economic boost to all the people in the region YJ Draiman
Has Mahmoud Abbas (The financer of the Munich Massacre and the Achille Lauro cruise ship Hijacking and murder; with a price on his head and a conviction with life in prison) and any other Arab-Palestinian organization or his people ever lived up to their promises or agreements? The answer is absolute no.
What has changed, after all the appeasements and concessions, why should
Israel trust them, if anything the situation has become more hostile and violence has increased. The Arab-Palestinians teach their children hate, violence and terror, they announce without any reservation and declare that they want to destroy Israel. (as stated in their charters).
A real and true peace will be an economic boost to all the people in the region. It will create an economy that the rest of the world would envy.
In recent years Israel has discovered vast amounts of Natural Gas and Oil, the blackmail by the Arab Oil producing nations is diminished, if not totally eliminated. With New production and new reserves, plus advancement in renewable energy and other sources of energy.
The over 50% drop in oil prices in the last 6 months of 2014 has obliterated the power of "Oil as a political weapon". This changes drastically the political formula in the Middle East. In addition; The United States becoming again the number one oil producing country in the world; The advancement in technology has promulgated that many other countries are discovering and developing new sources of Natural Gas and Oil, it will enhance the Energy independence of those countries and boost economic development throughout the world.
If the Arab-Palestinians continue with terror and violence, It is time to look for other avenues to bring safety and security to Israel's citizens.
Without beating around the bush and frankly it is time to seriously consider a population transfer. Under historical data, archeological excavations, possession and International law and treaties, Greater Israel belongs to the Jewish people.
The Arab-Palestinians, who have been kept in limbo by their fellow Arab countries must be afforded the opportunity to be transferred to the homes and lands (5-6 times the size of Israel 120,440 sq. mi. which was confiscated from the over a million persecuted Jewish families expelled from Arab countries it is valued in the trillions of dollars). They can also relocate the Arab-Palestinians to Jordan. The British in violation of the San Remo Treaty of 1920 assigned close to 80% of the land allocated to the Jewish people and gave it to the Arabs. It is called Jordan today with over 75% of the inhabitants are Arab Palestinians. Many Arab-Palestinians who live in Judea and Samaria have Jordanian citizenship.
It is time to resettle the Arab-Palestinians refugees in the Arab countries; Israel has resettled most of the million Jewish families expelled by the Arab countries in Greater Israel; The Arab countries have to do the same and resettle the Arab refugees in their vast lands.
YJ Draiman
Tell the United States to mind its own business and take care of business in the USA.
Do not dictate to
Israel what it should do or not do.
Why do the
United States give the land back to the American Indians and the Mexicans.
Greater Israel is not occupied territory it is the land of the Jewish people and has been for over 3000 years.
Most of the Arabs living in
Israel were brought in by the Jewish agriculture industry to work the fields in the 1800 thru early 1900. Those Arabs stayed in Israel.
The Arabs never had a country/State on Jewish territory except what was fraudulently taken from them by the British and given to
Jordan in violation of the 1920 San Remo Treaty and League of Nations vote after WWI. The Arabs expelled close to a million Jewish families from their countries and confiscated their assets and land 120,440 sq. km., let the Arabs in Greater Israel resettle in those properties and leave Israel. Stop the Arab false information about Israel.
End the Unjust Arab Occupation of Jewish Land – The Qur’an 17:104 – states the land belongs to the Jewish people
YJ Draiman
Jerusalem is Israel’s Capital. Israel has the right and obligation to build anywhere in Greater Israel. No one has the right to tell Israel where to build housing.
Israel needs about a half a million housing units as of 2012. Israel needs to build 100,000 housing units per year for the next 5 years just to catch-up to the needs of its people.
Let the Arabs move to the million homes and 120,440 sq, km. of land the Arabs confiscated from the million Jewish families they persecuted and expelled from their countries.
If the Arabs really wanted peace, they would off had peace many years ago.
YJ Draiman



Has Abbas or his people ever lived up to their promises or agreements, the answer is no.
What has changed, why should
Israel trust them now. They teach their children hate and declare that they want to destroy Israel.
A real peace will be an economic boost to all the people in the region. It will create an economy that the rest of the world would envy. In recent years
Israel has discovered vast amounts of Natural Gas and Oil, the blackmail by the Arab Oil producing nations is diminished. The United States and many other countries are discovering and developing new sources of Natural Gas and Oil, it will enhance the Energy independence of those countries and boost economic development.
YJ Draiman


John Kerry is the offspring of apostate Jews
E Pluribus Beagle
To be sure Obama does not regard the Kotel as Jewish.
So Mr. Kerry denies that the Pre-67 borders belong to the British, or to Jordan ? It cant belong to the P.L.O because they didn’t exist. There were a few thousand Arabs displaced in 1948. But the West Bank was the only front that we lost in 1948. Thousands of Jews were killed or driven out of Jerusalem and the West Bank and many were killed by King Hussein and claimed by Jordan. Was he ever asked to build a Palestinian State ? No. Because it was always a fiction that was designed for the secular Israeli consumer and to give the Holocaust deniers one final shot.
Arik
More than 70-80% of the American Jewish Freak show voted in Obama and this piece of drek. Now Israel is going to eat the proverbial poo.
Ivan Gur-Arie
I agree with John Kerry. In order to show my commitment to his kind of thinking, I hereby refuse to recognize any part of the United States acquired since 1789.
Lou Adams
Native Americans have a better claim than the Arabs that sweep into Palestine dotted with Jewish history and facts on the ground. There were no European places of worship or cemeteries in the new world.
As for Kerry the clown and his vile anti
Israel pressure without acknowledgment of the terrorist goings on among the Arabs is an unacceptable double standard. Where are our Obama loving Jewish leaders and socialist minded Jews now, are they still unable to recognize an Arab loving American president who gives to Israel with one hand and works to destroy them with everything else he has.
Otto Waldmann in Sydney
Instead of telling Kerry what he should say, it is far more interesting to find out WHY he is saying all that offensive, “unrealistic” stuff, not at all what a referee on the most contentious international issue should utter.
Beyond the immediate Israel PA issues, not far at all geo-politically, we find a seriously disturbed (!!)Islamic society, composed right now from far worse conflicting elements.
US involvement in the ME means also Egypt, Iraq, Syria and the larger radical Islamist terrorist upsurge. As a prime Islamic target not just on its strict soil, US needs to appease those spirits waged against US which still connect the “Palestine cause” to their overall “struggle”. This struggle concerns , of course Israel, but it targets even to a greater extent US. So, as a loyal American, Kerry is only doing his job, i.e. redirecting the Islamic terrorist fire strictly against its best friend, Israel.
Israel is not the ONLY entity negotiating here, US has its own ME problems to be sorted out at exactly the same table.
Chaim Yelenson
Keri in Hebrew means wasted seed, Kerry is a waste of time as well
Gerd Kaluski
I find it unbelievable that our New Secretary of State John Kerry takes it upon himself to make judgmental statements in favor to the Palestinian position regarding Jewish settlements in disputed areas. Nothing is being said by him over new settlements of Palestinians in those areas. Kerry reminds me of the State Department officials who took upon themselves to refuse Jewish refugees entry to the U.S. prior and during World War 2
trying to escape with their lives to a safe haven.
joosaretrash
that is another Jewish self serving myth, from 1930 to 1943 2.9 million Jews immigrated to the united states
Chaim Yelenson
what rubbish where did you get that nonsense from?.
After 1930 Jewish immigration into the
US was very limited.
VG
Joo… I suggest you refresh your history or start from fresh.
Mike P.
The numbers were closer to 300,000. Around 1924, Coolidge passed a bill severely limiting immigration that was not from places such as England and France. Jews had already reached about 5 million in the U.S. by 1922, and did not reach its peak of 6 million until around 1970.
Has Abbas or his people ever lived up to their promises or agreements, the answer is no.
What has changed, why should
Israel trust them now. They teach their children hate and declare that they want to destroy Israel.
A real peace will be an economic boost to all the people in the region. It will create an economy that the rest of the world would envy. In recent years
Israel has discovered vast amounts of Natural Gas and Oil, the blackmail by the Arab Oil producing nations is diminished. The United States
and many other countries are discovering and developing new sources of Natural Gas and Oil, it will enhance the Energy independence of those countries and boost economic development.
YJ Draiman
Tell the United States to mind its own business and take care of business in the USA.
Do not dictate to
Israel what it should do or not do.
Why do the
United States give the land back to the American Indians and the Mexicans.
Greater Israel is not occupied territory it is the land of the Jewish people that was liberated and has been for over 3500 years.
Most of the Arabs living in
Israel were brought in by the Jewish agriculture industry to work the fields in the 1800 thru early 1900. Those Arabs stayed in Israel.
The Arabs never had a country/State on Jewish territory except what was fraudulently taken from them by the British and given to
Jordan in violation of the League of Nations vote after WWI. The Arabs expelled close to a million Jews from their countries and confiscated their assets, let the Arabs in Greater Israel resettle in those properties and leave Israel. Stop the Arab false information about Israel
.
End the Unjust Arab Occupation of Jewish Land – The Qur’an 17:104 – states the land belongs to the Jewish people
YJ Draiman
Jerusalem is Israel’s Capital. Israel has the right and obligation to build anywhere in Greater Israel. No one has the right to tell Israel where to build housing.
Israel needs about a half a million housing units as of 2012. Israel
needs to build 100,000 housing units per year for the next 5 years just to catch-up to the needs of its people.
Let the Arabs move to the million homes the Arabs confiscated from the Jews they ejected from their countries.
If the Arabs really wanted peace, they would off had peace many years ago.
YJ Draiman
It is disgraceful, reckless, and dangerous that major Jewish “Defense” organizations do not stand up to the anti-Israel Obama Administration.
Singularly loyal to the Democratic Party (as it once was), these groups refuse to see that their Party has been hijacked. Taken over by Far Leftists, George Soros puppets, mushrooming Arab numbers, bedrock American traditions, including supporting Israel, are no more. (Recall the Dem. Convention booing and refusing support to Israel).
Obama and almost every appointee of his is anti-Israel. Brenner, Hagel, Kerry, Powers, Indyk, each is overtly/covertly critical of Israel, employing double-standards, or is outright pro-Arab.
Jewish “leadership” should ignore the false hype of Obama’s media Groupies. Doting on him, reporters consistently applaud Obama- never questioning his false claims. As far as Israel is concerned, however, Obama’s record is abysmal.
Kerry is pushing Obama’s anti-Israel agenda. If Jewish groups would band together and PUSH BACK – supporting Israel’s rights and exposing the hypocrisy of its critics, Israel would be in a MUCH stronger position.
Maybe then, 104 murderers (Abdallah Barghouti – 67 Life sentences, Abbas Al-Sayid – 35 Life sentences, Ibrahim Hamad – 54 Life sentences) and their ilk would not be offered up to Obama, just to get Abbas to the Table to talk about what else Israel can be forced to do.
joosaretrash
buying our elected officials does not mean Americans don't despise you filth
Mike P.
America would be about 1/3 less than what it now is, were it not for the contributions of the Jews. Jewish Americans have given America things like Broadway, Hollywood, Las Vegas, Miami Beach, its best TV and radio, big bands, Google, Facebook, Intel, Oracle, Qualcomm, Amgen, 1/3 of Wall Street, 1/3 of its Nobel Laureates, psychology, modern finance, same theory, nuclear power, the nuclear sub, the nuclear triad, thorium test reactors, the Golden Gate Bridge, the vaccines against polio and hepatitis-B, blue jeans, the zipper, the words on the Statue of Liberty, and the inspiration for “all men are created equal, endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.” And much more amazingly great things, without which America would have been far more puritan, backward and unequal.
Sonia Willats
SO WHY IS ISRAEL LENDING CREDIBILITY TO AMERICA AS A FAIR BROKER WHEN PATENTLY IT IS NOT? We need to apply brakes, seriously.
Ziporah
Kerry is WRONG. The US does NOT consider pre-1967 lands the borders of Israel. ISRAEL CONSISTS OF ALL JUDEA &SAMARIA plus not a few square miles of “Jordan” and “Lebanon”, not to mention all of the Sinai. Whatever Israel has “lost” by virtue of “peace” by piece by piece treaties with the Arabs and so- called Palestinians is rightfully Israel’s since the Arabs and Palestinians have NEVER UPHELD A SINGLE TREATY.
Pierre
Mr. John Kerry needs to renew his glasses, for having a better sight, in order to read a no fake Middle East History.
FlaGuy954
By the same token, Native Americans can claim that European whites that settled in North America illegally seized Indian lands and built illegal “settlements” (cities, towns, ranches, farms, etc.) on their territory and must abandon these areas and return them to the legitimate tribal owners. What say you to that, Mr. Kerry?
Sonia Willats
So true. And America should release a few thousand murderers as well, to proportionately equal the 104 prisoners it has asked Israel to release.


·                                 End the Unjust Arab Occupation of Jewish Land.

NO PALESTINIAN STATE – No land concessions R8.

The Palestinian Arabs have proven that land concession is detrimental to Israel, or any concession for that matter.
Imagine that the various people who settled in the United States for the past 300 years decided one day that they one to parcel the United States into an independent State just for them, would the American public go for it. The Answer is absolutely NO.
The situation in Israel today is no different. The Arabs there are not Palestinians, there is no such Arab nation as Palestine or Palestinian people.
Europeans countries today are consisting of numerous people from other countries. Would the Europeans people cede part of their country to set up another State in their midst. The answer is absolutely NO. ations and historical data is the best proof Israel belongs to the Jewish Nation and non-other.
All the Arabs in Israel and surrounding areas are from the various Arab nations, such as Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon and other Arab nations.

Transfer all Arabs from Israel to Jewish Land and Homes confiscated by Arab Countries.
Prominent PLO Arab says there are no 'Palestinians' and no "Palestine".
PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein admitted in a March 31, 1977 interview with a Dutch newspaper Trouw.
"The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism. "

The Qur'an 17:104 - states the land belongs to the Jewish people.
YJ Draiman
·                                  
·                                

Archeological excav...ations and historical data is the best proof Israel belongs to the Jewish Nation and non-other.
All the Arabs in Israel and surrounding areas are from the various Arab nations, such as Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon and other Arab nations.

Transfer all Arabs from Israel to Jewish Land and Homes confiscated by Arab Countries.
Prominent PLO Arab says there are no 'Palestinians' and no "Palestine".
PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein admitted in a March 31, 1977 interview with a Dutch newspaper Trouw.
"The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism. "

The Qur'an 17:104 - states the land belongs to the Jewish people.
YJ Draiman
See More
The Palestinian Arabs have proven that land concession is detrimental to Israel, or any concession for that matter.
Imagine that the various people who settled in the United States for the past 300 years decided one day that they one to parcel the United States into an independent State just for them, would the American public go for it. The Answer is absolutely NO.
The situation in
Israel today is no different. The Arabs there are not Palestinians, there is no such Arab nation as Palestine or Palestinian people.
Europeans countries today are consisting of numerous people from other countries. Would the Europeans people cede part of their country to set up another State in their midst. The answer is absolutely NO.

Archeological excav...ations and historical data is the best proof Israel belongs to the Jewish Nation and non-other.
All the Arabs in Israel and surrounding areas are from the various Arab nations, such as Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon and other Arab nations.

Transfer all Arabs from Israel to Jewish Land and Homes confiscated by Arab Countries.
Prominent PLO Arab says there are no 'Palestinians' and no "Palestine".
PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein admitted in a March 31, 1977 interview with a Dutch newspaper Trouw.
"The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism. "
Transfer all Arabs from Israel to Jewish Land and Homes confiscated by Arab Countries.
Prominent PLO Arab says there are no 'Palestinians' and no "Palestine".
PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein admitted in a March 31, 1977 interview with a Dutch newspaper Trouw.
"The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism. "

The Qur'an 17:104 - states the land belongs to the Jewish people.
·                                 Vote Draiman · New York University
End the Unjust Arab Occupation of Jewish Land.

NO PALESTINIAN STATE – No land concessions R8.

The Palestinian Arabs have proven that land concession is detrimental to Israel, or any concession for that matter.
Imagine that the various people who settled in the United States for the past 300 years decided one day that they one to parcel the United States into an independent State just for them, would the American public go for it. The Answer is absolutely NO.
The situation in Israel today is no different. The Arabs there are not Palestinians, there is no such Arab nation as Palestine or Palestinian people.
Europeans countries today are consisting of numerous people from other countries. Would the Europeans people cede part of their country to set up another State in their midst. The answer is absolutely NO.

Archeological excav...ations and historical data is the best proof Israel belongs to the Jewish Nation and non-other.
All the Arabs in Israel and surrounding areas are from the various Arab nations, such as Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon and other Arab nations.

Transfer all Arabs from Israel to Jewish Land and Homes confiscated by Arab Countries.
Prominent PLO Arab says there are no 'Palestinians' and no "Palestine".
PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein admitted in a March 31, 1977 interview with a Dutch newspaper Trouw.
"The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism. "

The Qur'an 17:104 - states the land belongs to the Jewish people.
YJ Draiman
See More
End the Unjust Arab Occupation of Jewish Land.

NO PALESTINIAN STATE – No land concessions R8.

The Palestinian Arabs have proven that land concession is detrimental to
Israel, or any concession for that matter.
Imagine that the various people who settled in the United States for the past 300 years decided one day that they one to parcel the United States into an independent State just for them, would the American public go for it. The Answer is absolutely NO.
The situation in
Israel today is no different. The Arabs there are not Palestinians, there is no such Arab nation as Palestine or Palestinian people.
Europeans countries today are consisting of numerous people from other countries. Would the Europeans people cede part of their country to set up another State in their midst. The answer is absolutely NO.

Archeological and historical data is the best proof
Israel belongs to the Jewish Nation and non-other.
All the Arabs in
Israel and surrounding areas are from the various Arab nations, such as Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon and other Arab nations.

Transfer all Arabs from
Israel to Jewish Land and Homes confiscated by Arab Countries.
Prominent PLO Arab says there are no 'Palestinians' and no "
Palestine".
PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein admitted in a
March 31, 1977 interview with a Dutch newspaper Trouw.
"The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of
Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism. "

The Qur'an 17:104 - states the land belongs to the Jewish people.
YJ Draiman




From an Era of Refugee Millions, Only Palestinians Remain

Ziona Draiman


8:43 PM

To: israel.draiman@middleeastfacts.net
Bcc: Ziona Draiman


The message is too big to be completely displayed. Only the first 4096 KB is shown.

From an Era of Refugee Millions, Only Palestinians Remain

The 1940s and ’50s saw huge forced moves of population groups—people who put down roots and started over.

By 
ANDREW ROBERTS
Nov. 21, 2014 6:49 p.m. ET
On Tuesday, as Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza celebrated the murder in a Jerusalem synagogue of five Israelis, the Spanish Parliament happened to be passing a nonbinding motion urging its government to “encourage the recognition of Palestine as a state.” Last month, Sweden became the first European Union member to officially recognize Palestine as a state, and parliamentarians in England and France have similar legislation in the works.
As anti-Israel sentiment grows in Europe—and in the U.S., where the “Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions” movement has taken hold on many college campuses—calls for an immediate resolution to the Palestinian “refugee” problem abound. To hear some in the anti-Israel movement today, one might imagine that the Palestinian exodus was a unique occurrence in modern history, that no other people have ever been moved off what they considered to be their ancestral lands.
A Palestinian protester hurls a rock at unseen Israeli soldiers during clashes near the West Bank city of Ramallah in November.ENLARGE
A Palestinian protester hurls a rock at unseen Israeli soldiers during clashes near the West Bank city of Ramallah in November. AFP/GETTY IMAGES
The truth is that such movements—including that of the Palestinians—happened so often in the mid-1940s to early 1950s that it is surprising that the plural of the word exodus—exodi?—is not used in reference to this period.
For all sorts of reasons, ethnic groups were either forcibly or voluntarily moved during that troubled period, and usually in far worse circumstances and for far longer distances than the Palestinians. There were no fewer than 20 different groups—including the Sikhs, Muslims and Hindus of the Punjab, the Crimean Tatars, the Japanese and Korean Kuril and Sakhalin Islanders, the Soviet Chechens, Ingush and Balkars—many in the tens or even hundreds of thousands, if not millions, who were displaced and taken to different regions.
Yet all of these refugee groups, except one, chose to try to make the best of their new environments. Most have succeeded, and some, such as the refugees who reached America in that decade, have done so triumphantly. The sole exception has been the Palestinians, who made the choice to embrace fanatical irredentism and launch two intifadas—and perhaps now a third—resulting in the deaths of thousands of Palestinians and Israelis.
After Germany lost World War II in 1945, more than three million of its people were forced to leave their homes in the Sudetenland, Silesia and regions east of the Oder and Neisse rivers—lands that their forefathers had tilled for centuries. These refugees embarked on a 300-mile journey westward under conditions of extreme deprivation and danger with only what they could carry in suitcases.
One can’t be expected to sympathize too much with people who had enthusiastically supported Adolph Hitler, but among them were children who were not responsible for the sins of their fathers. Having reached the new borders of East and West Germany, as delineated by the victorious Allies, they settled and made no irredentist claims to Poland and Czechoslovakia, the countries they had left. Today those once penniless refugee children include some of the most successful people in Germany, a country they helped make a prosperous, model democracy.
Across the Soviet Union in the late 1940s, the paranoiac evil of Joseph Stalin ensured that entire peoples, sometimes numbering in the millions, were moved from one side of Eastern Europe and the U.S.S.R. to the other. Some, like the Cossacks who had fought for Hitler, were massacred wholesale when they fell into the hands of Stalin or his satellite henchmen, such as Yugoslavia’s Marshal Josip Tito.
Millions of other people, as part of Communist schemes unrelated to the war, were “relocated” to Siberia, the Crimea or Central Asia, often many hundreds of miles from their ancestral lands and under the harshest conditions short of genocide. In all, forced internal migrations of the Tatars, Volga Germans, Ingush, Balkars, Karachays, Meskheta Turks and other ethnic groupings numbering some six million led to the deaths, according to the Soviets’ own figures, of up to 1.5 million, including 46% of the Crimean Tatars. Yet there are no appreciable irredentist movements among these former Soviet citizens today. They made the best of a new reality rather than carrying on a decades-long and ultimately hopeless struggle to return.
Similarly, the late 1940s saw massive population transfers in the Punjab and Northwest Frontier territories of India when the British brought their empire there to a close in 1947. Some 16 million people crossed between the new states of Pakistan and India, leading to the deaths of between one-half and three-quarters of a million people in the communal massacres that ensued.
Yet while there are severe border disputes still between India and Pakistan over Kashmir, practically no one from the Muslim, Hindu and Sikh communities is today agitating for restitution of the lands their forefathers farmed or owned in Punjab, the Northwest Frontier or elsewhere. There is distrust, but modern Indians and Pakistanis have moved on. The same is true of other parts of the world, such as Burma and South Africa, which also saw ethnic upheaval in the late-1940s.
Sadly, it has been the Arab states’ cynical and self-interested policy for nearly seven decades to keep the Palestinians boiling with indignation. No one can doubt that for those who have continued to live in camps intended for long-ago refugees, the founding of the state of Israel in 1948, when thousands of Palestinians fled or were expelled, was indeed a catastrophe. But many other peoples have learned to deal with equal or worse by moving onward and upward; calling them refugees several generations after their forebears’ upheaval would be unthinkable. The lessons of history are rarely enunciated more clearly.






CONFRONTING AMERICAN PRESSURE
In a 1983 article, “Washington’s ‘Arab mistake,’” Shmuel Katz writes, “The ignorance displayed by today’s world statesmen about elementary, often crucial, facts – particularly in foreign affairs – has lost the power to astonish. The Middle East, about which they all pontificate so readily, is a specially fertile field for their fatuities. Most important here inevitably are the pronouncements of American spokesmen, directly involved as they are in its problems.”
Katz was referring to statements by Former Secretaries of State Alexander Haig and George Shultz and Former President Jimmy Carter. But he would have said the same thing of Vice President Joe Biden, who stated at a press conference with the PA President, that:
“Our administration is fully committed to the Palestinian people and to achieving a Palestinian state that is independent, viable, and contiguous. … Everyone should know by now, that there is no viable alternative to a two-state solution, which must be an integral part of any comprehensive peace plan.”
This outrageous plan, which, if put into effect, would mean stripping Israel of its historic heartland in Judea and Samaria, robbing it of its strategic depth and returning it to the 1949 Armistice lines – what even the noted pacifist Abba Eban described as “Auschwitz borders.” On top of which, no one seems bothered by the fact that a “contiguous” Palestinian State means cutting the Jewish State in two.
To add insult to injury, Biden condemned an announcement by Israel’s interior ministry that same day to build 1,600 new homes in “East Jerusalem.” “The substance and timing of the announcement, particularly with the launching of proximity talks, is precisely the kind of step that undermines the trust we need right now,” Biden said. To show his disapproval, he arrived 90 minutes late to a dinner, snubbing Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Shmuel would say, as he had many times before, that this should finally put to rest the dangerous notion that America is, or ever was, an “honest broker.” What emerges from an examination of American-Israel relations is that regardless of whether the U.S. administration is friendly toward Israel (George W. Bush), or hostile (Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama),  each one accepts the same false premise that a two-state solution – which returns Israel to the dangerously vulnerable borders of 1949 – is the answer.
What Shmuel wrote in a 1983 article “Lessons for Reagan” is equally applicable now:
“American policy hitherto has taken no account of the fact that for 19 years (1948 to 1967) Judea and Samaria were in the hands of the Arabs, illegally annexed and ruled by Jordan.
“Yet nobody (not even the PLO) then even hinted that here was the home of a “Palestinian people,” thirsting for self-determination. Nor do the American policy-makers remember that precisely the control of the territory by Jordan made attractive the idea of war on tiny Israel.
“The absence of Jews from Judea and Samaria after 1948 did not bring peace. It brought war – in 1967.
“For an American president to persist in the demand that Jews refrain from making their homes in Judea and Samaria because it is not helpful to the peace process is not only to perpetuate one of the great hoaxes of the century, and an attack on the national rights of the Jewish people in its homeland; it is an insult to the intelligence.”
As destructive as American pressure is, worse is Israel’s repeated collapse in the face of such pressure, which merely invites more. Take the reaction of Israeli Interior Minister Eli Yishai to Biden’s criticism of the planned construction:
“We had no intention, no desire, to offend or taunt an important man like the vice president during his visit,” Yishai told Israel Radio. “I am very sorry for the embarrassment. We need to remember that approvals are done according to law even if the timing was wrong. … Next time we need to take timing into account.”
And Netanyahu, after being kept waiting 90 minutes by a sulking Vice President, reportedly apologized for the timing of the announcement, too, which he said also took him off guard, and assured Biden that he had no intention of sabotaging his visit, nor did he have any plans to begin construction soon.
That this is how sovereign leaders of a supposedly nationalist government should react after being told that they can’t build homes in their own capital beggars belief. Whatever the reason, whether Israel’s leaders don’t feel they can stand up to America, or fear losing economic assistance – that the “tap might be turned off” – the truth is that their weak-kneed response betrays the real, broad American support they have.
As poll after poll demonstrates – most recently one by Gallup on Feb. 26 showing 63% of Americans favor Israel over Palestinian Arabs in the conflict – America is squarely in Israel’s camp. It’s American policy crafted by the State Department that favors the Arabs. The State Department is not America. It can be faced, and with the help of the American people, defeated.
Only the day before Biden’s visit, Netanyahu addressed a summit of Christian Zionists in Jerusalem. He told them to stay the course in their defense of Israel. No doubt, his words boosted their morale. But wouldn’t it boost it still more to lead by example?
Biden’s visit was a missed opportunity in a long line of missed opportunities to put the lie to the scam that is the two-state solution. Netanyahu should have explained that the two-state solution is nothing more than the two-phase solution for Israel’s destruction. Indeed, in his conversation with Vice President Biden, the prime minister could have quoted nearly verbatim from Shmuel Katz:
“If the United States wishes to avoid further embarrassing debacles it must make up its mind first of all that at this moment there is no “solution” to the Arab-Israeli dispute; and that if it wishes to help bring about a solution in the course of time it must insist that the Arab nation give up its purpose of annihilating the Jewish state; that it content itself with its own 22 component states, and that the Arabs of Palestine content themselves with their one state in eastern Palestine, called Jordan.”
“Holding out such a prospect is purely more closely in keeping with the American ethic than its present promotion of Arab doctrines and policies which, it so happens, aim at the destruction of the State of Israel and the attempted dispersal or genocide of its people.”








Before Islam, Medina Was Originally A Jewish City in Saudi Arabia

Today, we hear a lot of talk about how Jerusalem should be split, – one half surrendered to Muslims, while the other half remains a mixed Muslim/Jewish city in Israel. If this is the appropriate diplomatic way of turning back the clock, and ensuring peace between Muslims
and Jews, then why not try out this solution with Medina first–a city that was originally Jewish?


The last occupier of Palestine was the Ottoman Empire. The last official country with an independent government in Palestine was the Jews. All others were just conquerors with no official independent government. After many years the Jewish people retained their land back and established its own government.
The Arabs who claim title to the lands in Palestine-Israel are thieves who have possessed land that was never theirs. They never purchased any of the land in any legal manor. The
Ottoman Empire owned over 90% of the land in Palestine and the Arabs were sharecroppers not owners.
Just like the Arabs who persecuted and expelled over a million Jewish families (who lived their countries for over 2,400 years) from their countries and confiscated their assets, businesses, homes and Real estate property 5-6 times the size of
Israel 75,000 sq. miles.
Like · Reply · 1 · Mar 24, 2015 2:22pm
Its not 50 years of "belligerent occupation", which is the only relevant occupation for imposing obligations on the occupant. It is 50 years following liberation as the Jewish People have owned the national rights to Palestine since 1920, first only a beneficial right, then later having legal dominion over it, partly in 1948 and part in 1967.

A short synopsis of Jewish History and the Arab Israeli conflict
Jews have the absolute right for their homeland. Zionism the movement itself was created during the second half the 1800″²s. Jews purchased a substantial amount of territories in Palestine-Israel (see testimony of the Mufti of Jerusalem in front of the British Peel Commission) from local sheikhs and lords and built settlements there. This dates as early as 1860, that is 79 years before WWII.
During all of this time Jews kept migrating back to their historic homeland which comprised of two kingdoms: the Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judah. They were driven out of the Kingdom of Israel by the Assyrians in 720, B.C.E. The Babylonians in 586, B.C.E., drove the Jews out of the Kingdom of Judah, including Jerusalem. Then followed the Persians in 536, and the Hellenistic Syrian Seleucid Rulers in 332 BCE. Jews – The Maccabees re-conquered Israel in 166 BCE.
Romans conquered Israel in 63 C.E., and in 70 A.D. destroyed the Jewish second Temple.
Which was followed by these conquests:
Byzantines in 313; Persian in 614; Arabs Muslims 636 CE; Crusaders 1099; and the Mamluks in 1291.
Then came the Ottoman Empire in 1517. In 1564 the Ottoman Empire encouraged and stimulated Jewish immigration which added over 10,000 new Jewish returnees to Palestine-Israel (The Ottoman land records for Palestine showed that the government owned over 90% of the land) and the British Rule 1918-1948.
During the time of the Roman rule of Israel, the Jews in the kingdom called Judea revolted against the Roman rule. The Romans crushed the rebellion, exiled many Jews out of the country, seized many others and turned them into slaves deporting them to Rome and other places. Not only that, they changed the name of the land from Provincia Judea to Palestine to humiliate the Jews.
For 600 years or so, Arab Muslims imperialism spread throughout the Middle East from Arabia. Among other conquests, the Arabs conquered Judea-Palestine, killing many of the local Jewish population, and converting many into Islam. The story of how the Arabs got to Palestine is the story of conquest, imperialism and occupation.
During the 19th and 20th century, when Arabs had little to no interest in the land of Israel, Jews purchased massive amounts of land and resettled there. After WWI the Allied Powers, the international community and the League of Nations under the San Remo Treaty of 1920 which was confirmed by the Treaty of Sevres and Lausanne adopted by the League of Nations assigned the British “The Mandate for Palestine” as trustee over the land so that a Jewish state would be created in that land. The British had their own agenda in mind (Oil).
The original Mandate territory included what is today Israel; Gaza, Parts of Sinai, West Bank (Judea and Samaria), Jordan and the Golan Heights. The British had their own agenda and in violation of International Treaties divided the country up. They gave to the Arabs the allocated land which had been Mandated to the Jewish people in violation of the San Remo Treaty of 1920 which was confirmed by the Treaty of Sevres and Lausanne: everything East of the Jordan river. This land which was intentionally given to the Arabs constituted 80% of the land allocated to the Jewish people. The British gave the land to the Hashemite Kingdom for the Arab population in order to create a new State: Trans-Jordan. The British also traded the Golan Heights to the French who ruled Syria for oil in Iraq. Thus, after already separating the country into one Arab state Trans-Jordan which is 78% of Jewish land and which is present day Jordan, they intended to break up the remaining Jewish land West of the Jordan River, present day Israel and wrongfully give it to the Arabs.
In the meanwhile a conflict emerged over territorial boundaries between the Jewish inhabitants and the Arabs. The U.N. proposed a deal to split the remaining land of the British Mandate for Palestine (yes, split yet again) into an Arab state and a Jewish state. The Jewish leadership accepted the proposal, provided the Arabs also accept it. The Arabs declined and rejected it outright. It is a known fact in the International community, that the UN. can only recommend and not supercede or modify international treaties. The UN recommendation vis-a-vis the partition of Palestine west of the Jordan river in 1947 was rejected by the Arabs, therefore the recommendation for partition not been executed by the Jews and the Arabs has no standing. Thus the 1948 war began. A war in which the Arabs with armies from Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon and local militias of Arabs, and help on a smaller scale from the armies of Algeria and Libya attacked the new Jewish entity. The Arab coalition had the weapons and a large army and were confident on victory, to the extent, that they asked the local Arab inhabitants to vacate the land while they decimated the Jews. But fate had other plans. Through divine intervention, the Arabs lost that war. Many Arab civilians fled their homes because their Arab leadership told them to. Some were panicked by rumors. There were only a few incidents with civilians. (It is an important fact that during the war of 1948, Jewish settlements that were seized by Arab forces were razed to the ground – Kfar Etzion for example and the remaining population there killed).
The true and detailed facts and history is much more voluminous and complex. The problem Israel faces is that it is not as quick to explain the 4000+ years of Jewish history in Israel as the indigenous people to counter the Arab lies and propaganda. Lies are easier to spread. However, upon close examination of the historical facts, the lies are exposed as baseless propaganda and should be dismissed as such. The Arabs are the occupiers in Greater Israel, just like the various empires who occupied Greater Israel since the destructions of the Jewish Temples by the Babylonians and the Romans who Named Israel Palestine and Jerusalem was named Aelia Capitolina.
It should be noted only a small segment of history is being presented here. I did not enumerate anything about how Arabs used terror and violence since the beginning of the conflict. I did not mention that before Arab nationalism and Muslim radicalism took over, the small Arab community was glad that the Jews were coming back to their ancestral homeland, providing an economic boost and jobs to the region, (even king Faisal representing the Arabs was delighted - he signed an *agreement with Chaim Weitzman representing the Jews in 1919.) I did not enumerate or discuss in detail the Arab-Palestinian refugees without telling how and why they became refugees.
I might also mention that the Arab countries expelled over a million Jewish people, confiscated their assets, businesses, homes and land (120,440 sq. km. which is five times the size of Israel and valued in the trillions of dollars). About 670,000 of those Jewish refugees from Arab countries were resettled in Greater Israel. It is time for the Arab countries who persecuted and expelled the million Jewish families to resettle the Arab-Palestinian refugees in their own countries, and or Jordan, and put an end to this conflict and end the misery and displacement of the Arab Palestinians. This will bring about peace and coexistence which the people so rightfully desire and deserve. It will bring economic prosperity and an increase in the standard of living for all the people.

YJ Draiman

*

 Faisal-Weizmann Agreement Between Arabs and Jews About Palestine| 3 Jan1919

Faisal-Weizmann Agreement Saudi Jews Agreement

Signed on January 3rd, 1919, the Faisal-Weizmann Agreement was an agreement between Jews and Arabs who both wished to set up their own nations in the Middle East.

Introduction

During the peace conference following World War I, the Emir Feisal, son of Hussein, Sherif of Mecca, signed an agreement with Dr Chaim Weizmann (who became later the first president of Israel) supporting the rights of the Jews in Palestine. However, in a handwritten note, the agreement was made contingent by Feisal upon fulfillment by the British of their promises to Feisal. Namely, the "Arab State" that would be formed, would include Syria. The British however, were bound by the promises they had made to France in the 1916: Sykes-Picot Agreement. Syria became a French mandate and Feisal was made king of Iraq instead. Subsequently, a spokesman for Feisal announced that "His majesty does not remember having written anything of that kind with his knowledge.

Subsequently, Weizmann averred that the Arab demands having been met, the agreement should be valid. He stated as much to the UNSCOP panel in Jerusalem:Testimony of Chaim Weizmann at UNSCOP. UNSCOP did not accept his view.

Agreement Between Emir Feisal ibn Hussein and Dr. Weizmann | 3 Jan 1919

His Royal Highness the Emir FEISAL, representing and acting on behalf of the Arab Kingdom of Hedjaz, and Dr. CHAIM WEIZMANN, representing and acting on behalf of the Zionist Organization. mindful of the racial kinship and ancient bonds existing between the Arabs and the Jewish people, and realising that the surest means of working out the consummation of their national aspirations is through the closest possible collaboration in the development of the Arab State and Palestine, and being desirous further of confirming the good understanding which exists between them, have agreed upon the following Articles:

ARTICLE I 
The Arab State and Palestine in all their relations and undertakings shall be controlled by the most cordial goodwill and understanding and to this end Arab and Jewish duly accredited agents shall be established and maintained in the respective territories. 

ARTICLE II 
Immediately following the completion of the deliberations of the Peace Conference, the definite boundaries between the Arab State and Palestine shall be determined by a Commission to be agreed upon by the parties hereto. 

ARTICLE III 
In the establishment of the Constitution and Administration of Palestine all such measures shall be adopted as will afford the fullest guarantee for carrying into effect the British Government's Declaration of the 2nd of November, 1917. 

ARTICLE IV 
All necessary measures shall be taken to encourage and stimulate immigration of Jews into Palestine on a large scale, and as quickly as possible to settle Jewish immigrants upon the land through closer settlement and intensive cultivation of the soil. In taking such measures measures the Arab peasant and tenant farms shall be protected in their rights and shall be assisted in forwarding their economic development. 

ARTICLE V
No regulation nor law shall be made prohibiting or interfering in any way with the free exercise of religion; and further the free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship without discrimination or preference shell forever be allowed. No religious test shall ever be required for the exercise of civil or political rights. 

ARTICLE VI 
The Mohammedan Holy Places shall be under Mohammedan control. 

ARTICLE VII 
The Zionist Organization proposes to send to Palestine a Commission of experts to make a survey of the economic possibilities of the country, and to report upon the best means for its development. The Zionist Organisation will place the aforementioned Commission at the disposal of the Arab State for the purpose of a survey of the economic possibilities of the Arab State and to report upon the best means for its development. The Zionist Organization will use Its best efforts to assist the Arab State in providing the means for developing the natural resources and economic possibilities thereof.

ARTICLE VIII
The parties hereto agree to act in complete accord and harmony on all matters embraced herein before the Peace congress. 

ARTICLE IX 
Any matters of dispute which my arise between the contracting parties shall be referred to the British Government for arbitration. 
Jan. 3, 1919

1 comment:

  1. Responding to arguments that million Jews expelled from Arab countries has no bearing on the Arabs who left Palestine or Arabs displaced from Jewish land and or formerly Ottoman government land has nothing to do with each other. The law of equity in not a one way street, it works both ways. The Arab nations that expelled the million Jewish families (who lived in the Arab countries for over 2500 years and owned 120,440 sq. km. of land, homes, businesses and personal assets valued in the trillions of dollars) are the ones supporting the Arab-Palestinians in demanding law of return and compensation. Those Arab countries are financing the Arab-Palestinians in their quest to eject the Jews a second time from their own ancestral homeland. The best and only solution is a population transfer.
    YJ Draiman

    ReplyDelete